All comparisons

Best content planning tools for one person, not a team

Most content planning tools were built for a content team: an SEO who pulls the keywords, a strategist who clusters them, an editor who assigns the briefs. If you do all three jobs yourself, seats and assignment stop mattering, and what decides it is whether the plan knows what is already on your site. The six below are sorted by who each tool was built for, and SitePerfector sits second because we build it.

Prices and features checked 3 Sep 2026 on each vendor's own pages.

1. Frase

$39/mo billed yearly on Starter ($49 monthly), $103/mo Professional, $239/mo Scale. Seven-day free trial, no card.

Best for

Frase puts research, brief, draft, optimize and publish on one bill and one login. Its briefs are the best in the category, and AI-visibility tracking is included at every tier rather than sold on top. Starter is one seat and one site.

Where it stops

It starts with a query you supply, and Topic Clusters group keywords you already have. The content calendar and internal linking arrive on the $103/mo Professional plan, not on Starter. Nothing in it tells you which topic to open first.

2. SitePerfector

$7 for the first 14 days, then $39/mo on Basic. Pro $99, Agency $179. Founder pricing, locked for life for the first 50 members.

Best for

SitePerfector is built for the person who is the whole team. Your market comes back as a tree of themes, topics and pages read from live search results, your existing pages are laid over it from a crawl, and each topic carries a decision with the sites you would be beating named. No Google Search Console connection is needed. Each map reads roughly 40,000 ranked positions and vets up to 1,500 keyword ideas, of which around a hundred earn a place.

Where it stops

There is no live content score to write against, no clustering engine that takes a 20,000-keyword upload, and no workflow builder. We have no backlink or PPC data, no AI-visibility tracking, no bulk generation and nothing that publishes on a schedule. There are no seats, assignments or due dates.

3. Surfer SEO (Topical Map)

Discovery $49/mo billed yearly, Standard $99, Pro $182, Peace of Mind $299. Seven-day trial with a card on file; it converts to a paid plan unless you cancel.

Best for

Surfer gives you topic ideas next to the best live editor in the category. You connect Google Search Console, it suggests topics for your niche, shows where competitors have coverage and you do not, and turns a suggestion into an outline you can write against straight away.

Where it stops

It gives you ideas and leaves the choice to you. The headline on their own feature page is "Find Your Next Content Ideas", and it does not say which of those topics your site can win or who you would be beating. Planning that keys off Search Console sees only queries for pages you already have.

4. Keyword Insights

Basic $58/mo, Professional $99/mo, 20 percent off annual. $1 for seven days, after which it drops to pay as you go rather than cancelling. Credits meter everything: 1 per keyword clustered, 100 per brief, 1,200 per agent article.

Best for

Keyword Insights turns a large keyword export into clean clusters with intent labels, up to 20,000 keywords in a single run on Professional. Discovery pulls from Google Autocomplete, Reddit and People Also Ask rather than a keyword database alone.

Where it stops

Step one is a keyword list you supply. There is no site crawl and no coverage view, so the plan never meets your existing pages, and nothing ranks the clusters by what your site could hold. Basic's 10,000 credits is eight agent articles a month, or roughly a hundred briefs.

5. MarketMuse

No price published. The pricing page shows Free, Optimize, Research and Strategy with limits and a Book a demo button. Third-party reviews from the last quarter still quote $99 to $499/mo.

Best for

MarketMuse has argued for topic-first planning since 2013, a decade before most of this category existed. The site Inventory tracks every published page automatically, with no upload. Personalized Difficulty scores a topic for your site rather than for an average site.

Where it stops

Their own page names the buyer: brands, publishers and agencies, with SEOs, strategists, editors and writers on staff. Queries and briefs are metered and capped per plan, and all nine brief types only unlock on the top tier. There is no public price, so you book a demo to find out what it costs.

6. AirOps

No price published. The pricing page shows Solo, Pro and Enterprise with limits and two buttons, Start for free and Work with us. The one number on it is $0.025 per task of overage on Solo. Third-party reports put Solo around $200/mo and Pro around $2,000/mo.

Best for

AirOps is for teams building content pipelines with a budget behind them. The workflow builder is drag-and-drop AI steps with human review and no code, and the opportunity worklist is the clearest view of what to work on next in this group. They have raised a $40M Series B.

Where it stops

Solo tracks ChatGPT only, and multi-engine insights start on Pro. Everything is metered in tracked prompts, pages and tasks, and there is no published price, so you find out what it costs in a conversation. This is a shelf above the one a single owner is shopping on.

How to choose

  • If your job is briefs, drafting and publishing on one bill, pick Frase.
  • If your job is clustering a large keyword export, pick Keyword Insights.
  • If your job is topic ideas beside a live editor, pick Surfer.
  • If your job is planning for a team with editors and writers on staff, pick MarketMuse or AirOps, and budget for a sales call because neither publishes a price.
  • If your job is deciding what to build next on a site you run alone, pick SitePerfector.

Search Console reports queries for pages that exist. It has no row for a topic you have never written about, so Surfer's Topical Map and anything else built on it can improve what you have and cannot say what to build. SitePerfector crawls your site and maps the market from live results instead, so every page in the map lands as covered, missing, or ranking without you knowing.

SitePerfector is not the pick if you want a live optimization score, a clustering engine at 20,000 keywords a run, or seats and assignment for a team, and three of the tools above do those well.

Questions

Do I need Google Search Console for any of this?

For Surfer's Topical Map, yes, that is where it starts. SitePerfector does not need it. We crawl your site directly and read the live results for your market, which matters if you never set Search Console up or your site is new enough that it has little to report.

Which of these is realistic for one person?

Frase, Surfer and SitePerfector are single-seat and self-serve. Keyword Insights works solo if you follow the credit costs. MarketMuse and AirOps were built for teams and neither publishes a price, so budget for a demo call.

Is SitePerfector a MarketMuse alternative?

For a solo owner, yes, and MarketMuse got the thesis right first. They built it for a content team with an analyst in the seat. We built ours for one person, and it returns an ordered list of pages to write rather than a research workspace. See the full comparison.

What does the $7 get me?

Fourteen days of the full product on Basic: your market mapped, your site laid over it, the pages worth writing in order, and a blueprint for each. Then $39 a month, cancel anytime. It is an intro price on Basic, so nothing is held back.

Next

Ready to grow your online presence?

Full access for 14 days — your topic map built, your gaps found, your content plan ready. Then Basic at $39/mo, locked for life for the first 50 members.

Try everything for 14 days — $7

$7 today · then $39/mo · cancel anytime